IS
DEMOCRACY A DANGEROUS CREED?
Often we have to
become slaves of circumstances. When people claim that the reason for all ills
of India is too much or unbridled freedom, I cannot help agreeing but at the
same time when they attribute it to democracy, it is difficult to accept, as the two are different from each other just
as education and literacy are. Democracy has to provide you fundamental freedom
while in autocracy it is optional. So if
you enjoy freedom under a noble and benevolent autocrat you cannot claim autocracy is good as you cannot claim
democracy is bad when you have irresponsible and in disciplined citizens . In other words, you should not be a slave of
circumstances. I have to say this emphatically because for too long, I have the
misfortune of people praising the past especially the British rule in this
country.
To me often, it
appears that this country is surviving because of the Supreme Court (SC). I am
amazed at the spectrum of issues and the amplitude of cases they have to deal
day in day out. Starting with
environment and science they have to give their verdict on issues political,
apolitical, important and irrelevant. But for the Supreme Court of India, Delhi
would have become uninhabitable even in the 1980s. I remember smog totally
covering Delhi and without the aid of instruments you cannot land in Delhi.
Your face and dresses would give out soot when washed. It was the determined
effort of SC of India that forced all DTC buses and auto rickshaws to change to
CNG. Similarly, it is the SC of India
which had to force the citizens to travel safe by forcing them to wear helmets
in two wheelers and belts in four wheelers. Whether it is followed in letter
and spirit in the whole country is a moot point. Since the governments are
failing in their duties, the courts have to waste their time and energy in
administering and saving the country and its people. But when they do, it is dubbed as judicial activism. If they
don’t do who will do?
The curse of this
country is that only the miniscule minority who work with conscience would be
dumped with and forced to work and also found fault with for minor
mistakes, while the lazy and scrupulous counterparts who enjoy life at others
expense are not only permitted to go scot free, but not even blamed and
sometimes even rewarded. Since the courts are by and large working, they are
forced to work beyond the call of duty. That is why we have till the end of
February 2015, Sixtyone thousand three hundred pending cases before the SC of
India and over 4.5 lakh cases in High Courts of India. But if a political
leader wants a case to be taken for argument immediately, even if it is a
flimsy one like defamation, the judge
has to oblige. If the courts are permitted to do their duty unfettered, we will
not only avoid delay in justice which amounts to denial but would not have
permitted a whopping 186 newly elected Members of Parliament with pending
criminal cases against them to enter and spoil the divinity of Parliament.
No comments:
Post a Comment